these messages and some are falling for them , losing thousands of dollars or becoming victims of identity theft in the process . “ These scams are just rampant , ” said David Milby , director of the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators ( NAUPA ) , which represents state unclaimed property programs . “ The email from the public we ’ ve been getting about this has increased tenfold in the past year. ” Some scammers pretendAttack.Phishingthey work for NAUPA and have even used its letterhead to make their pitch . Besides costing victims money , consumer advocates say this kind of fraud diminishes public trust in state agencies that handle unclaimed property and makes it harder for them to do their jobs . Unclaimed property is cash or other financial assets considered lost or abandoned when an owner can ’ t be found after a certain period of time . It includes dormant savings accounts and CDs , life insurance payments , death benefits , uncashed utility dividends and the contents of abandoned safe deposit boxes . There is plenty of it . In 2015 , unclaimed property agencies in the U.S. collected $ 7.8 billion and returned $ 3.2 billion to rightful owners , according to NAUPA . At last count in 2013 , states were holding on to $ 43 billion in unclaimed property . The treasurer , comptroller or auditor of each state maintains a list of abandoned property and runs an online database that anyone can search by name for free . Forty states and the District of Columbia also provide that information to a NAUPA-endorsed national website that the public can search . But fraudsters don ’ t bother reviewing or collectingAttack.Databreachthat data . They simply contact people at random , using email , letters or phone calls , hoping to snare a victim . The scams play on the idea that people are simply getting back assets they ’ re owed . “ There ’ s an air of legitimacy to them , ” said John Breyault , a vice president at the National Consumers League . “ People think it ’ s their money . ”
Intel ’ s newly announced 9-series CPUs bring a lot of exciting new features to the table , including higher clock speeds and the promise of greater gaming performance . But arguably one of the most important factors is in security . These chips are the first generation of new desktop CPUs to come withVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilityhardware fixes for the Spectre and Meltdown bugs which emerged in recent years . In particular , it ’ s the new K-series of gaming CPUs that are receivingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe fix . Those chips come with changes at the hardware level and should be far more secure against the kind of attacks that Spectre and its ilk have brought to light in recent years . Although they are still based on the same 14nm node that has dominated Intel ’ s chip designs since 2014 , these would be the first ones to come withVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitya fix for these sorts of bugs at the hardware level . The second set of new 9th-gen chips , the X-series ( and Xeon-class chips ) , don’t haveVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythose same security fixes . Because they ’ re based on the older Skylake-X architecture , Intel is relying solely on software updates to keep them protected againstVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythese possible vulnerabilities . News of the fixes were shared at Intel ’ s recent desktop press event , where it stated that , “ the new desktop processors include protections for the security vulnerabilities commonly referred to as ‘ Spectre , ’ ‘ Meltdown , ’ and ‘ L1TF. ’ These protections include a combination of the hardware design changes we announced earlier this year as well as software and microcode updates. ” The hardware alterations made to the chips protect against Meltdown V3 , otherwise known as the rogue data cache load bug . The L1 terminal fault exploit was also shored up with hardware changes . Software and microcode changes protect those same chips against the Spectre V2 branch target injection bug , the Meltdown V3 , a rogue system register read , and the variant V4 speculative store bypass flaw . In the laptop world , Intel has had a similar approach toward making hardware-level fixes . Some , but not all , have implemented hardware protections . Intel has been criticized in the past for the way it has handled these potentially critical flaws and has had a relatively slow move toward patchingVulnerability-related.PatchVulnerabilitythe vulnerabilities on a hardware level throughout 2018 .
Many people at GC are receivingAttack.Phishingone of the more popular phishing scam emails . It appears to beAttack.Phishingfrom Microsoft , a “ Security Alert ” wanting you to revalidate your account . If you did click on the email , please reset you Unify password ( and subsequent email password ) at password.gcsu.edu. We think that someone else might have accessed the Microsoft account * * * * * * * * @ gcsu.edu . When this happens we require you to verify your identity with a security challenge and then change your password the next time you sign in . If someone else has access to your account , they have your password and might be trying to accessAttack.Databreachyour personal information or send junk email